| |||||
| Get info on ... | Local News | Local History | WC Jim | Contact WCJIM | Links |
|
Back on February 7, 2006, the Planning, Zoning, Business &
Industrial Development (PZBID) committee of Borough Council began
its deliberations on what, if anything, to do to change the
Borough's building height limits. Last week, after nearly ten
months and as many public meetings, PZBID committee chair Carolyn
Comitta (Dem, Ward 5) unveiled a proposal. This article looks at
its details as well as some of the other activity surrounding
this effort.
As explained elsewhere on these pages, the question of height limits has aroused passionate debate in the past. The current limits -- a maximum of 45 feet everywhere in the Borough, plus two zones in the town center where, with special permission from Borough Council, one can build to 180 feet and 90 feet respectively -- were enacted in 1996. The issue came up again when the County announced its plans to build the new Justice Center, and the Borough's Comprehensive Plan (approved in 2000) called for Council to reconsider the limits. | |||
| Council began the work last February. During the year, they received a recommendation from the Planning Commission based on input from the Business Improvement District (BID, and the Historic Architecture Review Board (HARB). Council also hosted a well-attended public meeting at the West End Entertainment Complex on September 27 (facilitated by Comitta's husband Tom Comitta, a professional land planner and the author of the 1996 height proposal). In all, the issue appeared on the agenda of ten separate public meetings, and in addition, individual Council members attended several meetings organized by neighborhood groups. |
The September 27, 2006 "height workshop" attracted more than 200 participants | ||
| The December 2006 proposal was compiled by a working group that included Comitta plus members of the Planning Commission, the HARB and the BID. It retains the maximum 45 feet height limit throughout most of the Borough, reduces the maximum optional height in the Borough from 180 feet to 90 feet. It also contains three innovative ideas -- a prohibition against any buildings higher than 45 feet along the historic Gay Street corridor, incentives to shift development east of the town center, and several height option districts selected for their suitability for redevelopment, and not just because of where they happen to be located in the Borough. | |||
|
These maps show the existing (top) and proposed (bottom)
"height option districts" in the Borough of West Chester. The
proposal was introduced by Councilperson Committa (Dem, Ward 5)
at the December 12th PZBID committee meeting.
On the top map, buildings up to 180' tall are permitted in the green area and up to 90' tall in the gray area, in each case with special approval. The dividing line between the two height option districts is Walnut St. On the bottom map, buildings up to 90' tall would be permitted in both the green and gray areas with special approval, but in the gray area, buildings up to 60' tall would be permited "by right" (i.e. with no special approval). The dividing line between the two height option districts is Matlack St. Everywhere else, the "by right" height limit is 45 feet on both maps. The red lines mark the boundary of zoning districts. |
| ||
| |||
|
Preservation of the Gay Street corridor recognizes the objections raised by HARB in a letter to the Planning Commission last May and acknowledges the argument that West Chester's historic downtown is a major factor in the Borough's revitalization. By suggesting a maximum height option of 90 feet, the Comitta proposal seeks a compromise between the 135-foot recommendation offered by the Business Improvement District last July and the 60-foot recommendation offered in the HARB's December 7 letter to Borough Council. To provide an incentive for redevelopment of the area east of Matlack Street, Comitta's proposal offers the right to build up to 60 feet without special approval in the area bounded by E. Market, N. Matlack, and Bolmar Streets and the alley located one half block north of Gay Street. They could go even higher -- up to 90 feet -- with Council's permission, but that process also gives Council some control over the appearance of the building's landscaping, fencing, street wall and windows. (See Borough Code Chapter 112, Section 33, available at the Borough web page under "Reports >> Borough Code." Elsewhere, the new proposal would establish a 90-foot height option in several new areas and retain it along Market Street in the current 180-foot height option district. The new areas include the parking lot, warehouses and the site of the former water tower west of the corner of Gay and New Streets; the northeast corner of Chestnut and Walnut Streets; and the southeast corner of Walnut and Market Streets. [Note: As the proposal notes, within the historic district (which includes Market Street), Section 112-58 of the Borough Code provides rules limiting changes to or the demolition of historic structures.] | |||
|
The Comitta proposal arrives at the same time as an effort to ...
well, it's not entirely clear. A group calling itself the "West
Chester Neighborhood Consoritum" has assembled a web site which describes a
mission "to present a unified voice of the residential citizens
of West Chester Boro by sharing information important to the
community." It includes links to eight different neighborhood
organizations (not all are active), but most of the site's
content is devoted to an on-line "petition to Borough Council"
that asks for a 45-foot height limit throughout the Borough and a
60-foot height option in the Downtown. That is pretty much what
the HARB proposed in its December 7 letter to Borough Council,
and less than the HARB's recommendation (90 feet) last May.
A 60-foot building height limit would block several proposals that have been floated in the past year. One, from Teres Holdings, would build a 75-foot high hotel and parking facility on the Mosteller Garage site at the corner of Walnut and Chestnut Streets. [See details on the July 13 public meeting and response ] Another is the proposal by McCool Properties LLC to construct a 75' townhouse and parking structure on the former Yearsley's lot. |
Sixty-foot high buildings would be permitted "by right" in the area on the left side of this view of E. Market St. under the Comitta proposal. The HARB supports this as well. | ||
|
By restricting all building heights to 45 feet in the Gay Street historic corridor, Comitta's proposal exceeds the HARB proposal when it comes to preservation. Both proposals note than any construction in the historic district will be subject to the HARB guidelines and require Council approval. Both proposals also offer incentives to develop the area east of the town center, while reducing the overall height limits. But the Comitta proposal leaves room for the redevelopment of the Mosteller garage site in a way that brings a large hotel to the Town Center. Everyone will have about three weeks to think about it before the discussion resumes at the January 9 PZBID meeting. Expect Council to take action in the first quarter of the new year. |
|||
| Copyright 2006 by Jim Jones | |||