|
Parking in the News
[Posted August 11, 2006]
|
Perhaps you've noticed the recent flurry of Daily Local
News articles about parking. First, Brian Fanelli wrote
about a proposal to build a fourth
parking garage between Gay Street and Hannum Avenue, just
west of New Street, and the DLN's editorial writer added his two cents. Then Fanelli
described the "heated debate" at last
Monday's Parking Committee meeting over a proposal to replace two
parking spaces on Gay Street with outdoor restaurant tables. A
day later, Fanelli wrote about West Chester University's
proposal to build yet another parking garage on the corner of
W. Nields and S. New Streets. Today, there is another article and an editorial.
All of this comes just after the County completed its parking garage on W.
Market Street, the public heard proposals to redevelop the Mosteller
parking garage, and the Borough's Parking Department got its
web site up and running. But
there's more. Residents of the 100-block of E. Miner Street
showed up en masse to request permit parking for their
block at last Monday's Parking Committee meeting. They live on a
street that has one of the densest collections of single-family
residences in the Borough, and they've been heavily affected by
the proliferation of drinking establishments a block away at
Market and Walnut Streets. Add that to the fact that permit
parking in the neighborhoods closer to the University has shifted
parkers in their direction, and it wasn't hard to see their
point. The Parking Committee saw it, and moved their request on
to the next level.
|
Mosteller parking garage
|
|
The "heated debate" occurred later during the same committee
meeting. The DLN article suggested that the debate was between
two viewpoints, each supported by petitions signed by "over a
dozen" downtown business owners. While true, those who attended
the meeting also heard shouting and insults as downtown developer
Stan Zukin and business owner Joe Norley each tried to best their
opponent. The roots of the dispute go back to about 2000, when
Norley claimed leadership of the effort to control rental
properties while Zukin was a leader of the landlord association
that opposed the effort. They became collaborators for a time in
2002 when Norley rented space for his store from Zukin, but then
relations began to sour the following year after Zukin ordered
Norley to move. Norley sued, Zukin countersued, other lawsuits
followed, and the two men began to display their antagonism in
public. That antagonism was on display at Council committee
meetings last Monday and Tuesday.
Getting back to parking, the construction of multiple parking
garages shows that the Borough is undergoing change, although
some of the reaction shows that not everyone has caught on yet.
The change is this -- parking is no longer a free and unlimited
resource, to be consumed by its residents like the air that they
breath. Instead, parking is a resource with a cost, and since
private citizens have been unable to distribute it equitably (by
limiting their use of cars, for example), local government has
stepped in. The Borough, the County and the University have all
become involved in parking garage construction which offers not
only more spaces, but also a way to distribute them by making
people pay for their use.
|
|
The same kind of change has taken place in the past with other
resources that were once considered "free." For example, until
the end of the 19th century, what we now call sanitary sewage
disposal was once achieved by digging a hole in the backyard and
dumping waste in it. That seems to have worked well enough
through the 18th and most of the 19th century, but by 1888, the
Daily Local News reported that Goose Creek, which flows
through the east side of the Borough, was "one of the filthiest
streams that flow near West Chester" since "Nearly all the sewage
of the town flows into it, and, besides, a number of water
closets sit over it."
At first, the pollution only bothered people on the East Side
of town and farmers who lived downstream in neighboring
townships. But as the town became more crowded, it became harder
to separate outhouses from water wells, and more people became
willing to support a comprehensive solution. Although there were
holdouts -- old-timers who didn't see the need and wealthy who
lived on large lots far from the Borough's polluted streams --
Borough government managed to mobilize support for the
construction of water and sewer lines throughout the town by the
beginning of the 20th century. Of course, that required people
to pay sewer and water fees, so critics continued their
opposition for years by charging that it was all a scheme for
"the Borough" to make money.
|
Goose Creek was once "one of
the filthiest streams" in West Chester
|
|
We're at the same point with parking. Thanks to the County's
"Landscapes" plan, numerous efforts by Borough government plus
the initiative of many individual residents and business owners,
more and more people want to live in the Borough. Unfortunately,
some things that seem harmless become problems when packed close
together, and car parking is one of them. One example occurs
when a resident is unable to park near his or her residence -- an
inconvenience for someone who is young and healthy, but a serious
problem for someone who is aged and carrying groceries, or who is
frail and doesn't get home from work until the wee hours of the
morning. In neighborhoods where some people like to stay out
late and party, parked cars also generate noise disturbances when
their owners return at 2:00am, slamming doors, laughing loudly
and "laying rubber" as they drive off.
Lest anyone misunderstand, the problem is not caused by cars,
but by a large number of cars trying to park in a confined space
(cars cause other problems like air pollution and sprawl).
Eighty years ago, people in West Chester still kept horses in
their backyards and carriage houses. If that were true today and
the ratio of horses to human was the same, we'd be complaining
about the noise, smells and flies caused by our neighbors'
horses. But move the same number of people and horses out to a
rural township and you'd have farms, not complaints.
What is the solution? In the early 20th century, Borough
Council solved the problem of too much sewage for backyard
disposal by building a centralized disposal system and charging
people for their use: i.e. providing a financial incentive to
produce less sewage and handling the results in a way that
isolated the worst effects -- smell and bacteria -- from the rest
of the community. They took the same approach to providing safe
drinking water and to collecting solid waste (a.k.a. trash).
But should it cost money to park in the Borough? It
certainly does in other places -- anyone who has ever driven to
Manhattan can testify to the way that cost can be used to ration
parking -- and in fact, it already costs money here in the
Borough. Compare the prices of two houses in the same block, one
with off-street parking and the other with. For a more precise
dollar amount, ask the holders of monthly parking garage passes,
or visit a district court to see what parking offenders wind up
paying in fines, court costs and interest.
|
|
The only awkward aspect of this seemingly inevitable march
towards dollar-rationed parking is the way that some people
suffer even though their behavior hasn't changed. The families
on E. Miner Street are a good example -- for decades they have
been accustomed to parking a car on the street. Those who wanted
extra space used the alley to put a car behind their house. The
current problem was not caused by Miner Street families buying
extra cars; it's the result of businesses and rental properties
on neighboring streets attracting more people with cars, and
those car owners taking advantage of free parking on E. Miner
Street to avoid paying the true cost.
The Borough's permit parking program is an attempt to spare
residents from paying the cost of the newcomers' parking. It's
not fool-proof, but it generally gets good reviews from the
residents, and so far no block that has requested it seems
interested in giving it up. Critics of the program seem to fall
into three categories -- people who park in residential
neighborhoods in the hope of finding "free parking," political
partisans who want to discredit elected officials, and a few
old-timers who resent any change that comes to West Chester.
|
|
|
Parking garages and meters are designed to eliminate those
arguments. By placing a price on parking, they encourage people
to seek other solutions (although they also reinforce the
advantage that wealthy citizens have in getting access to
parking). State law protects the right of homeowners to park on
their own property -- if they can afford to buy enough property -
- but local zoning law makes sure that they don't damage their
neighbor's health or property. For everyone else, parking
entails day-to-day costs, be it feeding the meter, paying at the
garage, or alloting time (and gasoline) to find a "free" space.
Sound complicated? Well, it is, but like democracy, it beats
the alternative. All of the Borough's parking problems would go
away overnight if local government simply outlawed parking on
Borough streets. But then, a new crop of problems would make the
current complaints about parking seem laughable.
What can you do to improve parking in the Borough?
1. Find out if you have enough room on your property to
create an off-street parking space by calling the Department of
Building & Housing at 610-696-1773.
2. Instead of owning a car that you need to park, rent a car
when you need one and otherwise use public transportation, ride a
bicycle, or walk.
|
Barclay Friends Resurrects the Garden Tour
[Posted August 13, 2006]
|
West Chester has a long gardening tradition thanks to its
agricultural surroundings, relative wealth and the existence of
numerous professional nurseries and landscapers for the last 150
years. There is even an evergreen variety named after one of
West Chester's most famous gardeners -- Josiah Hoopes' picea
pungens glauca var Hoopesii.
West Chester has a second, related tradition -- garden tours
that allow the public to view creations that are normally hidden
from view. Over the years, there have been a variety of sponsors
including the Borough Recreation Department, the "Concerned
Citizens of West Chester" and various neighborhood associations.
For a few years at the beginning of this century, the tradition
died out, but the Barclay Friends Home has brought it back.
|
The former Barclay Friends
Home at 535 N. Church Street will serve as the focus of this
year's "Festival of Gardens" tour.
|
|
Barclay Friends, founded in 1893 and located on the 700-block
of N. Franklin St. since 1997, is a Quaker-related senior living
facility that provides residential and assisted living, short
stay rehabilitation, and nursing care to 150 residents in the
Borough. On Saturday, September 9, the Barclay Friends Home will
host its second annual "Festival of Gardens," enabling members of
the public to take a self-paced, self-guided tour of gardens in
the vicinity of 535 N. Church Street (the Barclay's former
building, now occupied by John Milner Associates).
This year's tour was organized by a committee headed by
Barclay Friends board member Susan H. Frens. According to Frens,
"West Chester is a town full of wonderful gardens and the aim of
the Festival is to give the public a chance to see and enjoy the
very best of them each year." The tour is also intended to raise
money and awareness for one of the Barclay's programs -- an
innovative horticultural therapy program that encourages
residents to get exercise and stay active by caring for the
Barclay's five gardens. The Barclay Friends gardens will be open
to the public for visits during the Festival and, after 2pm, for
refreshments and a special plant sale.
Advance tickets are on sale now for $20 per person at the
Barclay Friends and by mail. Tickets will also be available for
$25 on the day of the event (September 9) located at 535 N.
Church Street. For further information, contact Shannon
Heverin at Barclay Friends by calling 610-696-5211 or by email.
|
State Police Stymied by Sanchez Ruling
[Posted August 19, 2006]
|
Today, we're going to look at how a decision by one judge, US
District Court Judge Juan Sanchez, makes it harder for local
government to stop criminals. As many readers may remember,
Sanchez was a judge in Chester County from 1998 to June 2004. He
became notorious for invalidating the Borough's rental inspection
program because -- in his opinion -- the annual permit fee was
six dollars too high. This past February, another Sanchez ruling
denied the Pennsylvania State Police the right to require social
security numbers for criminal background checks on people who
want to buy handguns.
The case that led to Sanchez' decision began in June 2003
when a soldier named Michael Stollenwerk tried to buy a
handgun at a gun store in Lancaster County where he was a legal
resident. He provided some information but refused to give his
social security number (SS#) for the police background check,
which is required by state law (the Pennsylvania Uniform Firearms
Act -- see below). The state police refused to conduct the check
without his SS#, so he was not allowed to buy the gun. Moreover,
although state law gave Stollenwerk the right to appeal a denial
of his permit for other reasons, it did not allow him to appeal
the refusal by the State Police to conduct a background check
without a SS#.
|
|
|
Stollenwerk tried to purchase a handgun two more times in
2003 by applying directly to the Lancaster County Sheriff for a
permit. Both times he refused to give his social security
number, and both times the outcome was the same -- no background
check and no permit. In 2004, Stollenwerk filed a civil lawsuit
to argue that his Federal Privacy Rights were violated and to
force the State Police to check his background without using his
SS#.
In his decision, Sanchez agreed with Stollenwerk, but to
understand his argument you need to know something about the 1974
Federal Privacy Act, the 1993 Federal Brady Act, and the 1995
amendments to the Pennsylvania State Uniform Firearms Act (PA
UFA). In 1974, the US Congress enacted the Privacy Act which
governs how information about individuals is collected and used.
Only two sections actually tell people how to act -- section 3,
which explains how to collect information, and section 7, which
limits how that information can be used. In 1993 Congress passed
the Brady Act which required handgun purchasers to obtain a state
permit before someone can sell them a gun, and specified the
information that the purchaser must provide (name, sex, race,
date-of-birth and state-of-residence). The Brady Act also made
disclosure of a social security number or military identification
number optional (along with other information like height,
weight, color of eyes, etc.)
In 1995, Pennsylvania amended its UFA in response to the
Brady Bill and in 1998 it created the Pennsylvania Instant Check
System to process requests for criminal background checks. The
1995 version of the UFA requires a state police background check
before issuing a permit, and it requires provision of a SS# in
order to carry out the background check. So in order to buy a
handgun in Pennsylvania, an individual must 1) provide personal
information including SS# (required by the PA UFA, subject to
limits from the Federal Privacy Act), 2) wait for the results of
a criminal background check (required by UFA and governed by the
rules of the Pennsylvania Instant Check System), 3) and receive a
permit from the County in which the individual resides (required
by the Brady Act). At least, that's how it worked until Sanchez
made his decision.
|
|
Stollenwerk's attorney argued that by forcing his client to
disclose his SS# to obtain a handgun permit, the state police
violated the section 7 of the 1974 Federal Privacy Act. Section
7 forbids "any Federal, State or local government agency to deny
to any individual any right, benefit, or privilege provided by
law because of such individual's refusal to disclose his social
security account number" except where 1) a federal statute
specifically requires the disclosure of a SS# or 2) the
information is being collected for a program that existed before
the Privacy Act became effective in January 1, 1975.
|
|
|
Sanchez reviewed court cases that have set limits on the
Privacy Act over the years. Not surprisingly, court decisions
since 2000 have tended to restrict the application of the Privacy
Act by exempting businesses, banks and other non-federal
agencies, and specific uses like bail applications. In January
2006, only a month before the Sanchez decision, a federal appeals
court in Michigan ruled that the Privacy Act did not apply to
state or local agencies because of the way that the word "agency"
is defined in the law. [See sidebar] Instead of the Michigan
decision, however, Sanchez chose to rely on a 2003 case [
Schwier v. Cox, 340 F.3d 1284, 1288 (11th Cir. 2003)] that
rejected the State of Georgia's practice of requiring SS#s in
order to register voters.
|
|
Sanchez's ruling runs counter to the Michigan decision and goes
beyond the Georgia decision by making Pennsylvania's firearms
code and the state police subject to the Federal Privacy Act.
Sanchez justified this by treating the Privacy Act as two
separate parts and concluding that one does not apply to state
and local government while the other does. Sanchez decided that
the Michigan outcome did not apply because it involved a lawsuit
against a city government (Detroit) for damages due to the
disclosure of his SS#, a violation of section 3 of the Privacy
Act. Sanchez reasoned that Stollenwerk's complaint was about the
denial of his right to a handgun permit rather than the
disclosure of his SS#, so it only involved Section 7 (not Section
3) of the Privacy Act.
Regarding the "right" to a handgun permit, Sanchez merely
observed that "It is beyond cavil the legal ability to purchase
or obtain a license to carry a handgun is a `right, benefit, or
privilege.'" Handguns are not rifles or shotguns, and while the
Second Amendment to the US Constitution clearly states that "the
right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be
infringed," each state sets its own standards for gun permits,
purchasing and use (setting the dates of hunting season, for
example). By declaring that access to handguns is beyond cavil
(i.e. dispute), Sanchez implies that any effort to control their
use is automatically suspect.
If you are worried about big government that uses a "war on
terror" to justify phone tapping and internment camps, then
Sanchez' ruling might look like good news -- a challenge to
efforts to create a police state in America. But Sanchez didn't
prohibit background checks for gun buyers, he just made it them
less efficient. That hurts people who live with the fear of
street crime as well as law enforcement officials charged with
performing background checks.
|
The Michigan Decision
At the US Court of Appeals (6th District) in Michigan on January
15, 2006, a three-judge panel ruled that the Federal Privacy Act
applies only to federal agencies despite language in section 7(b)
that reads "Any Federal, State, or local government agency which
requests an individual to disclose his social security number
shall inform the individual whether that disclosure is voluntary
or mandatory, by what statuatory or other authority such number
is solicited, and what uses will be made of it."
The judges' reasoning? The Privacy Act relies on definitions
from another federal act, the "Freedom of Information Act," which
defines an "agency" in a way that limits them strictly to bodies
of the federal government. In other words, only employees and
departments of the federal government are bound by the Federal
Privacy Act, so Schmitt had no right to sue the City of Detroit
for accidently disclosing his social security number.
Read the
full text of the judges' decision in Daniel A. Schmitt v.
City of Detroit et al
|
|
It seems consistent with Sanchez' ruling in the West Chester
landlord case, however, which also relied on a convoluted
argument that ignored legal precedent in order to limit the power
of local government to regulate problems caused by private
individuals. Judge Sanchez' background is unusual (born in
Puerto Rico, grew up in the Bronx), and somewhere along the way
he appears to have developed into an activist judge with a
libertarian streak. Thanks to his youth (he was born in 1956)
and his life-time appointment as a federal judge, we'd better get
used to it.
|
"Pennsylvania's requirement that an applicant
disclose his Social Security number to purchase a handgun or
receive a license to carry a handgun is invalid under the federal
Privacy Act."
---
Judge Sanchez, Feb. 24, 2006
|
|
View the decisions mentioned in this article:
Stollenwerk v. Miller et al (Pennsylvania)
Schwier v. Cox (Georgia)
Schmitt v. City of Detroit et al (Michigan)
|
Trains, Trolleys and Buses
[Posted August 22, 2006]
|
Regular readers of this web site know that WCJIM likes trains.
He also likes buses and trolleys, and enjoys a bit of adventure
now and then, so yesterday (Monday, August 21), he combined them
all. Using a SEPTA Day Pass, WCJIM travelled from West Chester
to Media, then to several locations in Philadelphia before
returning to West Chester via Exton.
The trip began, as most SEPTA trips begin in West Chester,
with a ride on bus 104. The 104 bus leaves from the University
about every half hour, stops at the Market Street Transportation
Center in the new Justice Center parking garage, and then heads
east along Market Street and West Chester Pike all of the way to
West Philadelphia's 69th Street Terminal. It follows the trolley
route operated by the "Philadelphia, Castle Rock & West Chester
Railway" between January 2, 1899 and June 4, 1954. Afterwards,
first the Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Company and now
SEPTA operate the same route with buses. Currently, buses from
West Chester start at 5:00AM and run throughout the day an
evening until the last bus at 1:15AM.
The 8:37 bus was not crowded and it left on time. Although
there was construction on some of the side streets, rush hour was
at an end and the bus made good time as far as Newtown Square.
That's where WCJIM got off to catch the #118 bus to Media, which
showed up right on time at 8:14. It follows PA252, with a detour
to the Delaware County Community College campus, along the crest
of the Springton Reservoir and past Rose Tree Park to downtown
Media. It continues along Providence Road to Chester, but WCJIM
got off to look around Media a bit, where he discovered the
historic home of Dr. Philip Jaisohn, the first person born in
Korea to become a US citizen.
The next leg was one of the reasons for maing the trip in the
first place. SEPTA operates a surface trolley from Media to 69th
Street every half hour that, according to Borough Council
president Paul Fitzpatrick -- who grew up in Delaware County --
offers a beautiful ride through woods much of the way. He was
telling the truth. The route crosses the headwaters of various
tributaries of the Crum Creek, all of which are still covered
with woods. The route also passes the E. T. Richardson Middle
School (of the Springfield Delco School District) where WCJIM
speaks to 7th grade classes each year, plus Springfield High
School and the monumental Monsignor Bonner High School.
|
The #104 bus starts out
Marker at Media's Jaisohn house
The #101 trolley in Media
Bonner High School
|
|
At 69th Street, the next task was to figure out how to get to
Girard Avenue in order to ride one of the refurbished PUC
streetcars. Fortunately, schedules for every SEPTA line are
available at the 69th Street Terminal, but after glancing through
a few and trying to find the correct departure point for the #30
bus, WCJIM took the easy way out. SEPTA's routes in Philadelphia
closely follow the city's street grid, with buses, trolleys or
subways following the major arteries and buses running
perpendicular to fill in the holes. From Center City south, east
and west (and maybe north -- WCJIM didn't get that far), there is
no place that is more than two blocks from a SEPTA stop.
|
|
With that in mind, WCJIM boarded the Market Street-Frankford
elevated train, which heads north towards City Hall from 69th
Street. Actually, he boarded a shuttle bus to take passengers
past the reconstruction work that is underway between 52nd and
63rd Streets, but that produced no delay as traffic was light and
SEPTA had a line of shuttle buses standing by to take passengers.
[Historical note: The Market Street "El" was constructed in 1905-
1906. Moulton H. Davis, the namesake for one of West Chester's
fuel oil companies, worked on the project.]
The shuttle bus stopped at Market & 40th Street to allow
passengers to board the "El" which is actually a subway at this
point. WCJIM looked for one of the perpendicular bus routes and
found #40 within ten minutes. It took him northwest across
Powellton, Haverford and Lancaster Avenues to Girard Avenue,
where the restored streetcars operate roughly every fifteen
minutes in the middle of the day. Heading east, they pass
over SEPTA's R-5 suburban train line to Thorndale (more on that
in a bit) and pass the Philadelphia Zoo, cross the Schuylkill
River, go around Girard College and cross Market Street. At 3rd
Street, WCJIM got off and watched the trolley disappear towards
the waterfront, where it turns northeast and goes as far as Port
Richmond.
WCJIM got off at 3rd Street because he had an errand to run
at 3rd and South Street, but also because he saw something which
caught his eye. An unlabelled statue of what appeared to be a
conquistador sits near the corner of 3rd and Girard, but
despite WCJIM's best efforts, he did not discover its identity.
In the process, he missed the #57 bus which heads south from that
point, so he started walking.
The neighborhood is called Northern Liberties and it was
worth a look. Besides impressive old churches, new condo
construction, and an interesting mix of old industrial and
restored residential buildings, it also includes the shop where
Philadelphia's "Ducks" -- the military-surplus amphibious trucks
used for riverfront tours -- get their maintenance. Neighborhood
activists were in evidence as well, as shown by window signs
reading "CasiNO!" Several middle-
aged black women, a white skateboard dude and a couple of
Philadelphia public works employees all responded with friendly
greetings; only a pair of "yuppies" and a couple of real-estate
types acted as if they were too busy to say hello.
That was one of the most interesting things about the day --
talking with the people who take public transportation and
meeting people in new neighborhoods. On the #104 bus out of West
Chester, the passengers looked like a cross-section of the
Borough. Between Media and 69th Street, there was a wide range
of people, accents, colors, and ethnicities, and a higher
percentage of young women travelling with children. The shuttle
bus from 69th Street to 40th Street still carried a crowd that
looked mostly "suburban" -- not a surprise since so many suburban
lines meet at 69th Street. But once WCJIM got onto bus #40 and
started taking lines that criss-crossed the city, the passenger
profile became that of lower-middle-class Philadelphia: mostly
black, some Asian, a large number of students and a lesser number
of elderly. The last group was more willing to enter
conversations with a stranger, and WCJIM heard an eyewitness
account of Dr. Martin Luther King's visit to Philadelphia in the
early 1960s, learned about research on chimpanzee sociology in
Botswana, and heard several opinions of the state's casino
licensing plans (all negative).
|
A restored trolley car on Girard Avenue
The statue at 3rd & Girard
Anti-casino sign
A "Duck" gets maintenance on 4th Street
|
|
Eventually, it became time to leave Philadelphia, so after
catching the next #57 bus to the corner of 4th & South, WCJIM
walked to Independence Hall and then up Market Street to the
Philadelphia Suburban Station. This also has a story behind it -
- it was built on the site left vacant when fire destroyed a huge
Pennsylvania Railroad station in 1923. Nowadays, the station is
entirely underground, and at 2:30PM it was nicely air-
conditioned, not crowded, and clean enough for several people to
decide its was okay to sit on the platform. At 3:15PM, the R-5
train to Thorndale pulled in and WCJIM prepared for a ride along
the first part of the historical Pennsylvania "Main Line."
The "Main Line of Public Works" was built by the State of
Pennsylvania in the early 1830s to connect Philadelphia to
Pittsburgh using a combination of railroads, rivers, canals and
stationary steam engines to move loads over the mountains. It
was purchased by a group of Philadelphia investors in 1857 and
became a major route for the Pennsylvania Railroad, whose system
ultimately reached as far west as Chicago. It sparked the first
wave of suburban development in the late 19th century, and was
electrified as far as Paoli by 1915. Nowadays, it carries both
SEPTA trains as far as Thorndale (west of Downingtown) and AMTRAK
trains to Harrisburg and points further west.
The train made a stop at 30th Street station and then began
to climb away from the Schuylkill River. It passed the
Philadelphia Zoo and under Girard Avenue (where WCJIM had seen it
a few hours earlier), then continued past SEPTA's Overbrook
maintenance facility and under City Line Avenue into Delaware
County. The list of stations is familiar, not only to modern
commuters but also to anyone who grew up in the heyday of
railroads -- Merion, Narberth, Wynnewood, Ardmore, Bryn Mawr,
Rosemont, and so on -- only nowadays instead of waiting taxicabs,
all of the stations seem to sport Park-n-Ride lots.
The train pulled into Exton Station on time, but that
presented the first scheduling problem of the day. Bus #92 stops
at the station on its way in both directions between the Exton
Mall and West Chester's Parkway Plaza, but it left the station
three minutes before the train arrived and the next West
Chester-bound bus was not due for another eighty-two minutes. By
the looks of the people who got off of the train, most passengers
use their own cars, but that didn't do WCJIM any good. So he
decided to see how far he could walk, and cautiously made his way
along PA100 to the corner at Boot Road.
That's where it became clear that PA100 was designed to
inhibit pedestrians. With zooming cars muscling each other for
space as two lines squeezed down to one, WCJIM decided that
walking on the shoulder was not feasible -- at least not during
rush hour. Unfortunately, there were too many other obstacles
and no sidewalks, so walking in people's front yards was not an
option either. So WCJIM bought a cool drink at a nearby
convenience store and settled down with a book to wait for the
bus.
Living in West Chester has its benefits, however. After
about twenty minutes, WCJIM heard a voice from the parking lot
call out "Do you want a lift?" It was someone who had driven by
the bus stop and then doubled back to offer him a ride. A few
minutes later, he was back in the Borough, delivered to his
doorstep by someone who knew him from West Chester University.
The most remarkable thing about a day which included
conversations, sight-seeing, errands and local history was the
price -- the SEPTA daypass cost only $5.50. That bought passage
on to five buses (six, if you count #92), two trolleys and one
train, and covered roughly seventy-five miles. In a car that
gets twenty-five miles to the gallon, the gasoline alone would
cost around nine dollars. You can do the math yourself. WCJIM
already has, and that's why he likes to ride SEPTA.
For information about everything offered by the
Southeastern Pennsylvania Regional Transportation
Authority, visit their website at www.SEPTA.org.
|
|