West Chester news header
Get info on ... Latest News Local Government Local History WC Jim Links

Parking in the News
[Posted August 11, 2006]

Perhaps you've noticed the recent flurry of Daily Local News articles about parking. First, Brian Fanelli wrote about a proposal to build a fourth parking garage between Gay Street and Hannum Avenue, just west of New Street, and the DLN's editorial writer added his two cents. Then Fanelli described the "heated debate" at last Monday's Parking Committee meeting over a proposal to replace two parking spaces on Gay Street with outdoor restaurant tables. A day later, Fanelli wrote about West Chester University's proposal to build yet another parking garage on the corner of W. Nields and S. New Streets. Today, there is another article and an editorial.

All of this comes just after the County completed its parking garage on W. Market Street, the public heard proposals to redevelop the Mosteller parking garage, and the Borough's Parking Department got its web site up and running. But there's more. Residents of the 100-block of E. Miner Street showed up en masse to request permit parking for their block at last Monday's Parking Committee meeting. They live on a street that has one of the densest collections of single-family residences in the Borough, and they've been heavily affected by the proliferation of drinking establishments a block away at Market and Walnut Streets. Add that to the fact that permit parking in the neighborhoods closer to the University has shifted parkers in their direction, and it wasn't hard to see their point. The Parking Committee saw it, and moved their request on to the next level.

Detail of Moseller parking garage
Mosteller parking garage
The "heated debate" occurred later during the same committee meeting. The DLN article suggested that the debate was between two viewpoints, each supported by petitions signed by "over a dozen" downtown business owners. While true, those who attended the meeting also heard shouting and insults as downtown developer Stan Zukin and business owner Joe Norley each tried to best their opponent. The roots of the dispute go back to about 2000, when Norley claimed leadership of the effort to control rental properties while Zukin was a leader of the landlord association that opposed the effort. They became collaborators for a time in 2002 when Norley rented space for his store from Zukin, but then relations began to sour the following year after Zukin ordered Norley to move. Norley sued, Zukin countersued, other lawsuits followed, and the two men began to display their antagonism in public. That antagonism was on display at Council committee meetings last Monday and Tuesday.

Getting back to parking, the construction of multiple parking garages shows that the Borough is undergoing change, although some of the reaction shows that not everyone has caught on yet. The change is this -- parking is no longer a free and unlimited resource, to be consumed by its residents like the air that they breath. Instead, parking is a resource with a cost, and since private citizens have been unable to distribute it equitably (by limiting their use of cars, for example), local government has stepped in. The Borough, the County and the University have all become involved in parking garage construction which offers not only more spaces, but also a way to distribute them by making people pay for their use.

The same kind of change has taken place in the past with other resources that were once considered "free." For example, until the end of the 19th century, what we now call sanitary sewage disposal was once achieved by digging a hole in the backyard and dumping waste in it. That seems to have worked well enough through the 18th and most of the 19th century, but by 1888, the Daily Local News reported that Goose Creek, which flows through the east side of the Borough, was "one of the filthiest streams that flow near West Chester" since "Nearly all the sewage of the town flows into it, and, besides, a number of water closets sit over it."

At first, the pollution only bothered people on the East Side of town and farmers who lived downstream in neighboring townships. But as the town became more crowded, it became harder to separate outhouses from water wells, and more people became willing to support a comprehensive solution. Although there were holdouts -- old-timers who didn't see the need and wealthy who lived on large lots far from the Borough's polluted streams -- Borough government managed to mobilize support for the construction of water and sewer lines throughout the town by the beginning of the 20th century. Of course, that required people to pay sewer and water fees, so critics continued their opposition for years by charging that it was all a scheme for "the Borough" to make money.

Goose Creek
Goose Creek was once "one of the filthiest streams" in West Chester
We're at the same point with parking. Thanks to the County's "Landscapes" plan, numerous efforts by Borough government plus the initiative of many individual residents and business owners, more and more people want to live in the Borough. Unfortunately, some things that seem harmless become problems when packed close together, and car parking is one of them. One example occurs when a resident is unable to park near his or her residence -- an inconvenience for someone who is young and healthy, but a serious problem for someone who is aged and carrying groceries, or who is frail and doesn't get home from work until the wee hours of the morning. In neighborhoods where some people like to stay out late and party, parked cars also generate noise disturbances when their owners return at 2:00am, slamming doors, laughing loudly and "laying rubber" as they drive off.

Lest anyone misunderstand, the problem is not caused by cars, but by a large number of cars trying to park in a confined space (cars cause other problems like air pollution and sprawl). Eighty years ago, people in West Chester still kept horses in their backyards and carriage houses. If that were true today and the ratio of horses to human was the same, we'd be complaining about the noise, smells and flies caused by our neighbors' horses. But move the same number of people and horses out to a rural township and you'd have farms, not complaints.

What is the solution? In the early 20th century, Borough Council solved the problem of too much sewage for backyard disposal by building a centralized disposal system and charging people for their use: i.e. providing a financial incentive to produce less sewage and handling the results in a way that isolated the worst effects -- smell and bacteria -- from the rest of the community. They took the same approach to providing safe drinking water and to collecting solid waste (a.k.a. trash).

But should it cost money to park in the Borough? It certainly does in other places -- anyone who has ever driven to Manhattan can testify to the way that cost can be used to ration parking -- and in fact, it already costs money here in the Borough. Compare the prices of two houses in the same block, one with off-street parking and the other with. For a more precise dollar amount, ask the holders of monthly parking garage passes, or visit a district court to see what parking offenders wind up paying in fines, court costs and interest.

The only awkward aspect of this seemingly inevitable march towards dollar-rationed parking is the way that some people suffer even though their behavior hasn't changed. The families on E. Miner Street are a good example -- for decades they have been accustomed to parking a car on the street. Those who wanted extra space used the alley to put a car behind their house. The current problem was not caused by Miner Street families buying extra cars; it's the result of businesses and rental properties on neighboring streets attracting more people with cars, and those car owners taking advantage of free parking on E. Miner Street to avoid paying the true cost.

The Borough's permit parking program is an attempt to spare residents from paying the cost of the newcomers' parking. It's not fool-proof, but it generally gets good reviews from the residents, and so far no block that has requested it seems interested in giving it up. Critics of the program seem to fall into three categories -- people who park in residential neighborhoods in the hope of finding "free parking," political partisans who want to discredit elected officials, and a few old-timers who resent any change that comes to West Chester.

Parking on a residential street (S. Worthington
Street)

Parking garages and meters are designed to eliminate those arguments. By placing a price on parking, they encourage people to seek other solutions (although they also reinforce the advantage that wealthy citizens have in getting access to parking). State law protects the right of homeowners to park on their own property -- if they can afford to buy enough property - - but local zoning law makes sure that they don't damage their neighbor's health or property. For everyone else, parking entails day-to-day costs, be it feeding the meter, paying at the garage, or alloting time (and gasoline) to find a "free" space.

Sound complicated? Well, it is, but like democracy, it beats the alternative. All of the Borough's parking problems would go away overnight if local government simply outlawed parking on Borough streets. But then, a new crop of problems would make the current complaints about parking seem laughable.

What can you do to improve parking in the Borough?

1. Find out if you have enough room on your property to create an off-street parking space by calling the Department of Building & Housing at 610-696-1773.

2. Instead of owning a car that you need to park, rent a car when you need one and otherwise use public transportation, ride a bicycle, or walk.


Barclay Friends Resurrects the Garden Tour
[Posted August 13, 2006]

West Chester has a long gardening tradition thanks to its agricultural surroundings, relative wealth and the existence of numerous professional nurseries and landscapers for the last 150 years. There is even an evergreen variety named after one of West Chester's most famous gardeners -- Josiah Hoopes' picea pungens glauca var Hoopesii.

West Chester has a second, related tradition -- garden tours that allow the public to view creations that are normally hidden from view. Over the years, there have been a variety of sponsors including the Borough Recreation Department, the "Concerned Citizens of West Chester" and various neighborhood associations. For a few years at the beginning of this century, the tradition died out, but the Barclay Friends Home has brought it back.

535 N. Church Street
The former Barclay Friends Home at 535 N. Church Street will serve as the focus of this year's "Festival of Gardens" tour.

Barclay Friends, founded in 1893 and located on the 700-block of N. Franklin St. since 1997, is a Quaker-related senior living facility that provides residential and assisted living, short stay rehabilitation, and nursing care to 150 residents in the Borough. On Saturday, September 9, the Barclay Friends Home will host its second annual "Festival of Gardens," enabling members of the public to take a self-paced, self-guided tour of gardens in the vicinity of 535 N. Church Street (the Barclay's former building, now occupied by John Milner Associates).

This year's tour was organized by a committee headed by Barclay Friends board member Susan H. Frens. According to Frens, "West Chester is a town full of wonderful gardens and the aim of the Festival is to give the public a chance to see and enjoy the very best of them each year." The tour is also intended to raise money and awareness for one of the Barclay's programs -- an innovative horticultural therapy program that encourages residents to get exercise and stay active by caring for the Barclay's five gardens. The Barclay Friends gardens will be open to the public for visits during the Festival and, after 2pm, for refreshments and a special plant sale.

Advance tickets are on sale now for $20 per person at the Barclay Friends and by mail. Tickets will also be available for $25 on the day of the event (September 9) located at 535 N. Church Street. For further information, contact Shannon Heverin at Barclay Friends by calling 610-696-5211 or by email.


State Police Stymied by Sanchez Ruling
[Posted August 19, 2006]
Today, we're going to look at how a decision by one judge, US District Court Judge Juan Sanchez, makes it harder for local government to stop criminals. As many readers may remember, Sanchez was a judge in Chester County from 1998 to June 2004. He became notorious for invalidating the Borough's rental inspection program because -- in his opinion -- the annual permit fee was six dollars too high. This past February, another Sanchez ruling denied the Pennsylvania State Police the right to require social security numbers for criminal background checks on people who want to buy handguns.

The case that led to Sanchez' decision began in June 2003 when a soldier named Michael Stollenwerk tried to buy a handgun at a gun store in Lancaster County where he was a legal resident. He provided some information but refused to give his social security number (SS#) for the police background check, which is required by state law (the Pennsylvania Uniform Firearms Act -- see below). The state police refused to conduct the check without his SS#, so he was not allowed to buy the gun. Moreover, although state law gave Stollenwerk the right to appeal a denial of his permit for other reasons, it did not allow him to appeal the refusal by the State Police to conduct a background check without a SS#.

Sanchez opinion under the magnifying glass
Stollenwerk tried to purchase a handgun two more times in 2003 by applying directly to the Lancaster County Sheriff for a permit. Both times he refused to give his social security number, and both times the outcome was the same -- no background check and no permit. In 2004, Stollenwerk filed a civil lawsuit to argue that his Federal Privacy Rights were violated and to force the State Police to check his background without using his SS#.

In his decision, Sanchez agreed with Stollenwerk, but to understand his argument you need to know something about the 1974 Federal Privacy Act, the 1993 Federal Brady Act, and the 1995 amendments to the Pennsylvania State Uniform Firearms Act (PA UFA). In 1974, the US Congress enacted the Privacy Act which governs how information about individuals is collected and used. Only two sections actually tell people how to act -- section 3, which explains how to collect information, and section 7, which limits how that information can be used. In 1993 Congress passed the Brady Act which required handgun purchasers to obtain a state permit before someone can sell them a gun, and specified the information that the purchaser must provide (name, sex, race, date-of-birth and state-of-residence). The Brady Act also made disclosure of a social security number or military identification number optional (along with other information like height, weight, color of eyes, etc.)

In 1995, Pennsylvania amended its UFA in response to the Brady Bill and in 1998 it created the Pennsylvania Instant Check System to process requests for criminal background checks. The 1995 version of the UFA requires a state police background check before issuing a permit, and it requires provision of a SS# in order to carry out the background check. So in order to buy a handgun in Pennsylvania, an individual must 1) provide personal information including SS# (required by the PA UFA, subject to limits from the Federal Privacy Act), 2) wait for the results of a criminal background check (required by UFA and governed by the rules of the Pennsylvania Instant Check System), 3) and receive a permit from the County in which the individual resides (required by the Brady Act). At least, that's how it worked until Sanchez made his decision.

Stollenwerk's attorney argued that by forcing his client to disclose his SS# to obtain a handgun permit, the state police violated the section 7 of the 1974 Federal Privacy Act. Section 7 forbids "any Federal, State or local government agency to deny to any individual any right, benefit, or privilege provided by law because of such individual's refusal to disclose his social security account number" except where 1) a federal statute specifically requires the disclosure of a SS# or 2) the information is being collected for a program that existed before the Privacy Act became effective in January 1, 1975. Social security card and shady character

Sanchez reviewed court cases that have set limits on the Privacy Act over the years. Not surprisingly, court decisions since 2000 have tended to restrict the application of the Privacy Act by exempting businesses, banks and other non-federal agencies, and specific uses like bail applications. In January 2006, only a month before the Sanchez decision, a federal appeals court in Michigan ruled that the Privacy Act did not apply to state or local agencies because of the way that the word "agency" is defined in the law. [See sidebar] Instead of the Michigan decision, however, Sanchez chose to rely on a 2003 case [ Schwier v. Cox, 340 F.3d 1284, 1288 (11th Cir. 2003)] that rejected the State of Georgia's practice of requiring SS#s in order to register voters.

Sanchez's ruling runs counter to the Michigan decision and goes beyond the Georgia decision by making Pennsylvania's firearms code and the state police subject to the Federal Privacy Act. Sanchez justified this by treating the Privacy Act as two separate parts and concluding that one does not apply to state and local government while the other does. Sanchez decided that the Michigan outcome did not apply because it involved a lawsuit against a city government (Detroit) for damages due to the disclosure of his SS#, a violation of section 3 of the Privacy Act. Sanchez reasoned that Stollenwerk's complaint was about the denial of his right to a handgun permit rather than the disclosure of his SS#, so it only involved Section 7 (not Section 3) of the Privacy Act.

Regarding the "right" to a handgun permit, Sanchez merely observed that "It is beyond cavil the legal ability to purchase or obtain a license to carry a handgun is a `right, benefit, or privilege.'" Handguns are not rifles or shotguns, and while the Second Amendment to the US Constitution clearly states that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed," each state sets its own standards for gun permits, purchasing and use (setting the dates of hunting season, for example). By declaring that access to handguns is beyond cavil (i.e. dispute), Sanchez implies that any effort to control their use is automatically suspect.

If you are worried about big government that uses a "war on terror" to justify phone tapping and internment camps, then Sanchez' ruling might look like good news -- a challenge to efforts to create a police state in America. But Sanchez didn't prohibit background checks for gun buyers, he just made it them less efficient. That hurts people who live with the fear of street crime as well as law enforcement officials charged with performing background checks.

The Michigan Decision

At the US Court of Appeals (6th District) in Michigan on January 15, 2006, a three-judge panel ruled that the Federal Privacy Act applies only to federal agencies despite language in section 7(b) that reads "Any Federal, State, or local government agency which requests an individual to disclose his social security number shall inform the individual whether that disclosure is voluntary or mandatory, by what statuatory or other authority such number is solicited, and what uses will be made of it."

The judges' reasoning? The Privacy Act relies on definitions from another federal act, the "Freedom of Information Act," which defines an "agency" in a way that limits them strictly to bodies of the federal government. In other words, only employees and departments of the federal government are bound by the Federal Privacy Act, so Schmitt had no right to sue the City of Detroit for accidently disclosing his social security number.

Read the full text of the judges' decision in Daniel A. Schmitt v. City of Detroit et al

It seems consistent with Sanchez' ruling in the West Chester landlord case, however, which also relied on a convoluted argument that ignored legal precedent in order to limit the power of local government to regulate problems caused by private individuals. Judge Sanchez' background is unusual (born in Puerto Rico, grew up in the Bronx), and somewhere along the way he appears to have developed into an activist judge with a libertarian streak. Thanks to his youth (he was born in 1956) and his life-time appointment as a federal judge, we'd better get used to it.
"Pennsylvania's requirement that an applicant disclose his Social Security number to purchase a handgun or receive a license to carry a handgun is invalid under the federal Privacy Act."
      --- Judge Sanchez, Feb. 24, 2006
gavel

View the decisions mentioned in this article:
Stollenwerk v. Miller et al (Pennsylvania)
Schwier v. Cox (Georgia)
Schmitt v. City of Detroit et al (Michigan)


Trains, Trolleys and Buses
[Posted August 22, 2006]
Regular readers of this web site know that WCJIM likes trains. He also likes buses and trolleys, and enjoys a bit of adventure now and then, so yesterday (Monday, August 21), he combined them all. Using a SEPTA Day Pass, WCJIM travelled from West Chester to Media, then to several locations in Philadelphia before returning to West Chester via Exton.

The trip began, as most SEPTA trips begin in West Chester, with a ride on bus 104. The 104 bus leaves from the University about every half hour, stops at the Market Street Transportation Center in the new Justice Center parking garage, and then heads east along Market Street and West Chester Pike all of the way to West Philadelphia's 69th Street Terminal. It follows the trolley route operated by the "Philadelphia, Castle Rock & West Chester Railway" between January 2, 1899 and June 4, 1954. Afterwards, first the Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Company and now SEPTA operate the same route with buses. Currently, buses from West Chester start at 5:00AM and run throughout the day an evening until the last bus at 1:15AM.

The 8:37 bus was not crowded and it left on time. Although there was construction on some of the side streets, rush hour was at an end and the bus made good time as far as Newtown Square. That's where WCJIM got off to catch the #118 bus to Media, which showed up right on time at 8:14. It follows PA252, with a detour to the Delaware County Community College campus, along the crest of the Springton Reservoir and past Rose Tree Park to downtown Media. It continues along Providence Road to Chester, but WCJIM got off to look around Media a bit, where he discovered the historic home of Dr. Philip Jaisohn, the first person born in Korea to become a US citizen.

The next leg was one of the reasons for maing the trip in the first place. SEPTA operates a surface trolley from Media to 69th Street every half hour that, according to Borough Council president Paul Fitzpatrick -- who grew up in Delaware County -- offers a beautiful ride through woods much of the way. He was telling the truth. The route crosses the headwaters of various tributaries of the Crum Creek, all of which are still covered with woods. The route also passes the E. T. Richardson Middle School (of the Springfield Delco School District) where WCJIM speaks to 7th grade classes each year, plus Springfield High School and the monumental Monsignor Bonner High School.

SEPTA's 104 bus heads east on Market Street
The #104 bus starts out

  historical marker for Dr. Philip Jaisohn's house in
Media
Marker at Media's Jaisohn house

  SEPTA's #101 trolley on State Street in Media
The #101 trolley in Media

  Monsignor Bonner High School in Springfield, Delaware
County
Bonner High School

At 69th Street, the next task was to figure out how to get to Girard Avenue in order to ride one of the refurbished PUC streetcars. Fortunately, schedules for every SEPTA line are available at the 69th Street Terminal, but after glancing through a few and trying to find the correct departure point for the #30 bus, WCJIM took the easy way out. SEPTA's routes in Philadelphia closely follow the city's street grid, with buses, trolleys or subways following the major arteries and buses running perpendicular to fill in the holes. From Center City south, east and west (and maybe north -- WCJIM didn't get that far), there is no place that is more than two blocks from a SEPTA stop.

With that in mind, WCJIM boarded the Market Street-Frankford elevated train, which heads north towards City Hall from 69th Street. Actually, he boarded a shuttle bus to take passengers past the reconstruction work that is underway between 52nd and 63rd Streets, but that produced no delay as traffic was light and SEPTA had a line of shuttle buses standing by to take passengers. [Historical note: The Market Street "El" was constructed in 1905- 1906. Moulton H. Davis, the namesake for one of West Chester's fuel oil companies, worked on the project.]

The shuttle bus stopped at Market & 40th Street to allow passengers to board the "El" which is actually a subway at this point. WCJIM looked for one of the perpendicular bus routes and found #40 within ten minutes. It took him northwest across Powellton, Haverford and Lancaster Avenues to Girard Avenue, where the restored streetcars operate roughly every fifteen minutes in the middle of the day. Heading east, they pass over SEPTA's R-5 suburban train line to Thorndale (more on that in a bit) and pass the Philadelphia Zoo, cross the Schuylkill River, go around Girard College and cross Market Street. At 3rd Street, WCJIM got off and watched the trolley disappear towards the waterfront, where it turns northeast and goes as far as Port Richmond.

WCJIM got off at 3rd Street because he had an errand to run at 3rd and South Street, but also because he saw something which caught his eye. An unlabelled statue of what appeared to be a conquistador sits near the corner of 3rd and Girard, but despite WCJIM's best efforts, he did not discover its identity. In the process, he missed the #57 bus which heads south from that point, so he started walking.

The neighborhood is called Northern Liberties and it was worth a look. Besides impressive old churches, new condo construction, and an interesting mix of old industrial and restored residential buildings, it also includes the shop where Philadelphia's "Ducks" -- the military-surplus amphibious trucks used for riverfront tours -- get their maintenance. Neighborhood activists were in evidence as well, as shown by window signs reading "CasiNO!" Several middle- aged black women, a white skateboard dude and a couple of Philadelphia public works employees all responded with friendly greetings; only a pair of "yuppies" and a couple of real-estate types acted as if they were too busy to say hello.

That was one of the most interesting things about the day -- talking with the people who take public transportation and meeting people in new neighborhoods. On the #104 bus out of West Chester, the passengers looked like a cross-section of the Borough. Between Media and 69th Street, there was a wide range of people, accents, colors, and ethnicities, and a higher percentage of young women travelling with children. The shuttle bus from 69th Street to 40th Street still carried a crowd that looked mostly "suburban" -- not a surprise since so many suburban lines meet at 69th Street. But once WCJIM got onto bus #40 and started taking lines that criss-crossed the city, the passenger profile became that of lower-middle-class Philadelphia: mostly black, some Asian, a large number of students and a lesser number of elderly. The last group was more willing to enter conversations with a stranger, and WCJIM heard an eyewitness account of Dr. Martin Luther King's visit to Philadelphia in the early 1960s, learned about research on chimpanzee sociology in Botswana, and heard several opinions of the state's casino licensing plans (all negative).

one of the restored PUC trolley cars on SEPTA's #15
Girard Avenue line
A restored trolley car on Girard Avenue

  unusual statue at the corner of Girard Ave. and 3rd
Street in Philadelphia
The statue at 3rd & Girard

  window sign showing opposition to casino proposals for
Philadelphia
Anti-casino sign

  maintenance facility for Philadelphia's amphibious
trucks
A "Duck" gets maintenance on 4th Street

Eventually, it became time to leave Philadelphia, so after catching the next #57 bus to the corner of 4th & South, WCJIM walked to Independence Hall and then up Market Street to the Philadelphia Suburban Station. This also has a story behind it - - it was built on the site left vacant when fire destroyed a huge Pennsylvania Railroad station in 1923. Nowadays, the station is entirely underground, and at 2:30PM it was nicely air- conditioned, not crowded, and clean enough for several people to decide its was okay to sit on the platform. At 3:15PM, the R-5 train to Thorndale pulled in and WCJIM prepared for a ride along the first part of the historical Pennsylvania "Main Line."

The "Main Line of Public Works" was built by the State of Pennsylvania in the early 1830s to connect Philadelphia to Pittsburgh using a combination of railroads, rivers, canals and stationary steam engines to move loads over the mountains. It was purchased by a group of Philadelphia investors in 1857 and became a major route for the Pennsylvania Railroad, whose system ultimately reached as far west as Chicago. It sparked the first wave of suburban development in the late 19th century, and was electrified as far as Paoli by 1915. Nowadays, it carries both SEPTA trains as far as Thorndale (west of Downingtown) and AMTRAK trains to Harrisburg and points further west.

The train made a stop at 30th Street station and then began to climb away from the Schuylkill River. It passed the Philadelphia Zoo and under Girard Avenue (where WCJIM had seen it a few hours earlier), then continued past SEPTA's Overbrook maintenance facility and under City Line Avenue into Delaware County. The list of stations is familiar, not only to modern commuters but also to anyone who grew up in the heyday of railroads -- Merion, Narberth, Wynnewood, Ardmore, Bryn Mawr, Rosemont, and so on -- only nowadays instead of waiting taxicabs, all of the stations seem to sport Park-n-Ride lots.

The train pulled into Exton Station on time, but that presented the first scheduling problem of the day. Bus #92 stops at the station on its way in both directions between the Exton Mall and West Chester's Parkway Plaza, but it left the station three minutes before the train arrived and the next West Chester-bound bus was not due for another eighty-two minutes. By the looks of the people who got off of the train, most passengers use their own cars, but that didn't do WCJIM any good. So he decided to see how far he could walk, and cautiously made his way along PA100 to the corner at Boot Road.

That's where it became clear that PA100 was designed to inhibit pedestrians. With zooming cars muscling each other for space as two lines squeezed down to one, WCJIM decided that walking on the shoulder was not feasible -- at least not during rush hour. Unfortunately, there were too many other obstacles and no sidewalks, so walking in people's front yards was not an option either. So WCJIM bought a cool drink at a nearby convenience store and settled down with a book to wait for the bus.

Living in West Chester has its benefits, however. After about twenty minutes, WCJIM heard a voice from the parking lot call out "Do you want a lift?" It was someone who had driven by the bus stop and then doubled back to offer him a ride. A few minutes later, he was back in the Borough, delivered to his doorstep by someone who knew him from West Chester University.

The most remarkable thing about a day which included conversations, sight-seeing, errands and local history was the price -- the SEPTA daypass cost only $5.50. That bought passage on to five buses (six, if you count #92), two trolleys and one train, and covered roughly seventy-five miles. In a car that gets twenty-five miles to the gallon, the gasoline alone would cost around nine dollars. You can do the math yourself. WCJIM already has, and that's why he likes to ride SEPTA.

For information about everything offered by the
Southeastern Pennsylvania Regional Transportation Authority,
visit their website at www.SEPTA.org.


 

Copyright 2006 by Jim Jones